This is not child custody, It is child PROTECTION issue.
OUR GOAL IS TO PUT FAMILY COURT JUDGES THAT HAVE BROKEN THEIR OATH OF OFFICE AND THE LAW IN PRISON. MAKE NO BONES ABOUT IT, JUDGES CONVICTED OF CHILD ABUSE,
DOMESTIC ABUSE, IMPERSONATING A THERAPIST. PRACTICING PSYCHOLOGY WITHOUT A LICENSE, DENYING PARENTS THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, REFUSING DUE PROCESS, ETHICS VIOLATIONS FOR PRACTICING THERAPY OUT OF THEIR FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION, FAILURE TO REPORT CHILD ABUSE, JUDICIAL MALPRACTICE, EXTORTION, BLACKMAIL, COLLUSION,USING CHILD ABUSE AS A TACTIC.
DOMESTIC ABUSE, IMPERSONATING A THERAPIST. PRACTICING PSYCHOLOGY WITHOUT A LICENSE, DENYING PARENTS THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, REFUSING DUE PROCESS, ETHICS VIOLATIONS FOR PRACTICING THERAPY OUT OF THEIR FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION, FAILURE TO REPORT CHILD ABUSE, JUDICIAL MALPRACTICE, EXTORTION, BLACKMAIL, COLLUSION,USING CHILD ABUSE AS A TACTIC.
When a judge appears in front of a judicial committee, there is a good chance these
Judges are in collusion or biased with the Judges accused. The dilemma, Many of these judges believe they are in a brotherhood. Many will protect their friends and feel it is a house of cards. Similar to the catholic church child abuse scandal.
My opinion is to keep the pressure on. If one judge refuses to protect children and partners then
that judge is just as guilty and needs to be served with protecting a child abuser.
Judges are in collusion or biased with the Judges accused. The dilemma, Many of these judges believe they are in a brotherhood. Many will protect their friends and feel it is a house of cards. Similar to the catholic church child abuse scandal.
My opinion is to keep the pressure on. If one judge refuses to protect children and partners then
that judge is just as guilty and needs to be served with protecting a child abuser.